Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23513 (AP)

M/s Sri Hari Minerals v. The Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company

WP/28536/2014 · 2025-02-10

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY. THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 28536 OF 2014 Between: M/s. Sri Hari Minerals, Givindapalli Village, Obulavaripalli Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, Rep by its Managing Partner Smt.K.Dhanalaxmi, R/o. H.No.10-412, Lakshmi Nagar, Railway Kodur, YSR Kadapa District. ...PETITIONER AND The Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company, Ltd., Tirupathi, rep by its Chairman & Managing Director. The Chief General Manger Finance, A.P.S.P.D.C.L., Tirupathi, Chittoor District, A.P. The Chief General Manger Operation , A.P.S.P.D.C.L., Tirupathi, Chittoor District, A.P,. The Superintending Engineer, Operation, A.P.S.P.D.C.L., Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. The Senior Accounts Officer, A.P.S.P.D.C.L. Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. The Divisional Engineer Operation, A.P.S.P.D.C.L., Rajampet, YSR Kadapa District. The Assistant Divisional Engineer Operation, A.P.S.P.D.C.L., Railway Kodur, YSR Kadapa District. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or directions, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 5*^ respondent, in asking the petitioner to pay the minimum charges and surcharge for the period i.e. 30-09-2013 to 15-05-2014 of Rs.6,78,856/- through his letter No,SE/O/KDP/SAO/JAO/HT/D.No.270/14, dated 15-07-2014 in spite of .petitioner representation dated 28-07-2014, pending decision the 7 * 'respondent disconnected power supply to the petitioner industry on 28-08-2014 without giving any notice or opportunity and rejecting petitioner request by Memo No.CGM/Fin/GM(R)/AO/JAO-HT/D.No.880/14, dated 09- 09-2014, by the 2'^'^ respondent which is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to the rules and violation of orders of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.No.37000 of 2013, dated 01-04-2014 and consequently set aside the Memo No.CGM/Fin/GM(R)/AO/JAO-HT/D.No.880/14, dated 09-09-2014, issued by the 2nd respondent further direct the respondents to restore the power supply to the petitioner industry forthwith with all consequential benefits or other wise petitioner will suffer serious finance loss and great hardship. th I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 35727 OF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Memo No.CGM/ Fin/ GM(R)/A0/JA0- HT/D.No.880/14, dated 09-09-2014, issued by the 2 restore the power supply to my industry forthwith. nd respondent and Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI CHALLA SIVASANKAR Counsel for the Respondents; SRI VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA, SC FORAPSPDCL Counsel for the Respondents: SRI P. VINOD KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010332002014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY .THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 28536/2014 Between: ...PETITIONER M/s Sri Hari Minerals AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.CHALLASIVASANKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1 .VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL 2.P VINOD KUMAR The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 28536/2014 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a letter dated 06.02.2025 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. Permission as sought for is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No 1. 2. 3. costs. miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand As a sequel closed. SD/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// - t N OFFICER SE To 1. One CC to Sri Challa Sivasankar, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri Venkata Rama Rao Kota, SC for APSPDCL (OPUC) 3. One CC to Sri P. Vinod Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:10/02/2025 13 FEB 2025 o» 7/ ORDER . Current Section ^ %s2cspatc««S^ WP.No.28536of2014 DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS