Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2351 (UTT)

Amrat Chauhan v. Smt Ruby Chauhan

FA/138/2017 · 2025-03-05

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Vivek Bharti Sharma

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures FA 138/2017 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J. Mr. Pankaj Semwal, Advocate, i/b Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Nikhil Singhal, Advocate, for the respondent. (2) This appeal, filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, is directed against the judgment and order dated 24.10.2017, passed by Judge, Family Court, Haridwar in O.S. No. 436 of 2013. By the said judgment, divorce suit filed by the appellant on the ground of cruelty was dismissed. (3) Mr. Nikhil Singhal, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent, submits that appellant is not represented through Counsel since 25.2.2021 nor the appellant himself is appearing before this Court. He submits that coordinate Bench, vide order dated 18.2.2025, directed to list this appeal today under the caption “for dismissal”. (4) Today also, Mr. Pankaj Semwal, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Gaurav Singh, has appeared. He makes a statement that Mr. Gaurav Singh has lost contact with the appellant and now he has no instruction to appear in the matter. (5) In such view of the matter, we have no other option but to dismiss the appeal in non-prosecution. Ordered accordingly. (Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 5.3.2025 Pr