[2025:RJ-JP:26272] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10306/2025 1. Rajulal Son Of Late Choogalal, R/o Village And Post Nimbheda, Tehsil Pipalu, District Tonk, Presently Working As H.c. Driver No. 223, In Police Line Tonk. 2. Satyanarain S/o Shivjilal Jat, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Mahaveer Nagar, Near Bansal Hospital, Tonk Presently Working As Constable Driver Belt No. 888, In Police Line, Jaipur. 3. Shankar Lal S/o Ramkaran, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village And Post Katmana, Tehsil Piplu, District Tonk Presently Working As H.c. Driver Belt No. 404 In Circle Office, Pipalu, District Tonk. 4. Ramavtar S/o Shri Faudilal Jatav, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Village And Post Kutakpur, Post Sirthala, Tehsil Nagar, District Bharatpur Presently Working As Constable Driver Belt No. 964, In The Office Of Superintendent Of Police, Tonk. 5. Satyendra Singh S/o Shri Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Village Nimola, Tehsil And District Tonk Presently Working As Constable Driver Belt No. 895, At Police Station Jhitana, District Tonk. 6. Phool Singh Meena S/o Raghunath Meena, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Jaleri, Dewarawas, Tehsil Dooni, District Tonk Presently Working As Constable Driver Belt No. 250, In Circle Office Deoli District Tonk. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, (Home), Ministry Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Superintendent Of Police, Tonk. 4. The Financial Advisor, Police Head Quarter, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.I. Abbassi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG Ms. Kavita Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order [2025:RJ-JP:26272] (2 of 4) [CW-10306/2025] 15/07/2025 1. With consent of learned counsel for both the parties, the writ petition has been heard finally on merits. 2. Petitioners, by means of filing instant writ petition, have raised a common grievance for not granting the selection scale for the post of Sub-Inspector on completion of 18 years of service from the post of Constable Driver. It has been pointed out that petitioners belong to M.T. Cadre and since promotional post of ASI from Head Constable is not available, petitioners are eligible and entitled to get selection scale on next promotional post i.e. Sub- Inspector. 3. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue raised by petitioners in the instant writ petition has been answered positively, by the Coordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur vide Judgment dated 20.12.2023 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3873/2019 titled Amar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., placing reliance on the judgment rendered by Division Bench in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.763/2011 decided on 02.08.2011 titled State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Banney Khan, and affirmed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.1766/2015 on 12.05.2015. The relevant paras of the Judgment of Coordinate Bench dated 20.12.2023 reads as under:- “10.This Court further observes that the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court in the case of State of Rajasthan & Ors. V/s Banney Khan (D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W)No. 763/2011) was challenged before the Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.1766/2015 and the same was affirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court on 12.05.2015. 11.This Court also observes that the petitioners were appointed on the post in question as M.T. Cadre and thereafter, their next promotional post was Head Constable [2025:RJ-JP:26272] (3 of 4) [CW-10306/2025] and then Sub-Inspector as per the M.T. Cadre, and therefore it is clear that the petitioners are eligible for pay scale of the next promotional post, but the said benefit was denied by the respondents, which is not justified in law. 12.This Court further observes that the petitioners at the completion of 9 years of regular services, were granted the pay scale of the next promotional post, but thereafter, on completion of 18 years of the services, the respondents did not grant them the benefits of the next promotional post, which impugned action is not sustainable in the eye of law, because the respondents at the first instance i.e. completion of 9 years of services considered the petitioners for next promotional pay scale as per the M.T. Cadre, but at the same time, denied them the same benefit on completion of 18 years of service. 13.This Court also observes that the impugned action of denial of grant of the pay scale of the next promotional post to the petitioners by the respondents and granting the petitioners the pay scale of different Cadre i.e. Assistant Sub inspector is not permissible in the eye of the law. 14.Thus, in light of the above observations and afore-quoted precedent laws as well as looking into the factual matrix of the present case, the present petition is allowed and the impugned order dated 10.12.2018 is quashed and set-aside, while directing the respondents to grant to the petitioners the pay scale benefits of the next promotional post as per the M.T. Cadre i.e Sub-Inspector from the date the petitioners became eligible therefor. All pending applications stand disposed of.” 4. Learned Additional Advocate General, Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, appearing for and on behalf of the State, does not dispute that the issue raised by petitioners in the present writ petition is covered by the final judgment dated 20.12.2023 passed in Amar Singh (supra). 5. Learned counsel for both the parties admit that the judgment passed in case of Amar Singh (supra) has been implemented, as [2025:RJ-JP:26272] (4 of 4) [CW-10306/2025] the State Government did not opt to assail the judgment passed in case of Amar Singh (supra) dated 20.12.2023. 6. In view of above, the instant writ petition is allowed in terms of judgment dated 20.12.2023 passed in SBCWP No.3873/2019 and petitioners are also entitled to get benefit of selection scale for the post of Sub-Inspector on completion of their 18 years of service on the post of Constable. 7. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /319