1 2025:CGHC:23282-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2746 of 2025 M/s Gayatri Infratech Place of Business In Front of Dandakaranya Press, Vrindavan Colony, Maa Sontoshi Ward, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh, Through Its Partner, Mr. Sachin Singh Kushwaha, S/o Mr. Akhilesh Singh Kushwaha Aged About 30 Years. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. The Chief Engineer (Central Tender Cell), Office of Engineer-In- Chief, P.W.D. Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The Superintending Engineer, Public Work Departments, Bastar Circle, Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh. 4. The Executive Engineer, Public Work Departments (B And R), West Bastar Division Bijapur, Chhattisgarh. ...Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Harshwardhan Parganiha, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.06.13 11:13:47 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 12.06.2025 1. Heard Mr. Harshwardhan Parganiha, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Shashank Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for the State. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “10.1 Direct the respondent authorities to make the payment of GST to the petitioner firm over and above the rates quoted by it while submitting the bid; 10.2 Direct the respondents authorities to expedite the process of settlement of all the pending bills relating to the subject work; 10.3 Pass any other order or issue such directions as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in light of the facts and circumstances of the present case, in the interest of justice.” 3. After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition to avail the alternate remedy available to him under the law. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 3 5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn without any further liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan