ASIT C MEHTA INVESTMENT INTERRMEDIATES LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR KIRIT H VORA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.M.P./2660/2024 · 2025-03-04
Ambuj Nath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23486 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23486 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 2660 of 2024
1. Asit C Mehta Investent interrmediates Limited having its office at Pantomath Nuclear House, Saki Vihar Road, Andheri East, P.O and P.S. August Kranti Marg, District Mumbai, Maharasthra through its Director Kirit H. Vohra, aged about 65 years, son of late Shri Himatlal Vora, resident of KarmaKshetra Building No. 10, D-1 Wing, Flat No. 81, 368, Flank Road, near Shanmukhanand hall, Kings Circle, Sion East, P.O and P.S. August Kraanti Marg, District Mumbai, Maharashtra
2. Asit Chimanlal Mehta,aged about 64 years, son of Chimanlal Mehta, resident of 17A Abhilasha Building, Augsut Kranti Marg, P.O and P.S. August Kranti Marg, District Mumbai, Maharashtra
3. Deena Asit Mehta, aged about 63 years, wife of shri Asit Chimanlal Mehta, resident of 17A Abhilasha Building, Augsut Kranti Marg, P.O and P.S. August Kranti Marg, District Mumbai, Maharashtra
4. Mangalam Securities through its proprietor Hari Shankar Modi, aged about 64 years son of Late Chandi Prasad Modi, resident of Zila School Road, Dumka, P.O Dumka, G.P.O, P.S. Dumka Town, District Dumka, Jharkhand
5. Hari Shankar Modi, aged about 64 years son of Late Chandi Prasad Modi, resident of Zila School Road, Dumka, P.O Dumka, G.P.O, P.S. Dumka Town, District Dumka, Jharkhand --- --- Petitioners Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Rajendra Prasad, son of Late Sanehi Lal Basaiwala @ Goyal, resident of Sarai Road, P.O. Sarai Road, P.S. Dumka Town, District Dumka (Jharkhand)
---
--- Opp. Parties ---
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath
---
For the Petitioners: Mr. Sumit Prakash, Advocate
For the O.P-State: Mr. Prabir Kr. Chatterjee, Special P.P. --- 03 / 04.03.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this criminal miscellaneous petition.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ambuj Nath, J) Ranjeet/ Uploaded