Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23484 (HP)

RICHA SHARMA v. STATE OF HP AND ORS

CWP/13849/2025 · 2025-08-28

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.13849 of 2025 Date of Decision: 28.08.2025 _______________________________________________________ Richa Sharma …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Precisely, the grouse of the petitioner as has been highlighted in the petition and further canvassed by Mr. Vinod Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, is that in the month of April, 2025, petitioner had filed representation(Annexure P-3) to the Grievance Redressal Committee constituted by Director Health Service, Himachal Pradesh for redressal of her grievance with regard to change of her cadre from Director Health Services(DHS) to Director Medial Education (DME), but the same has not been decided, as a result thereof, son of the petitioner, who is suffering from mild to moderate level of autism, is in trouble. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. Though, having taken note of the pleadings adduced on record, which are duly supported by affidavit, this Court finds that prior to change of cadre, petitioner herein had given option, but since Notification dated 27.03.2025, whereby existing cadre of Paramedical, Nursing, Ministerial and other ancillary/supporting staff came to be bifurcated, itself provides for representation to be considered by the Grievance Redressal Committee, coupled with the fact that petitioner has already filed representation to the competent authority, this Court without going into the merits of the case, deems it fit to dispose of the same with a direction to the petitioner to file fresh representation to the Grievance Redressal Committee constituted by Director Health Service, Himachal Pradesh, within a period of three days, which in turn shall be decided by the Grievance Redressal within a period of two weeks thereafter. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, committee concerned shall consider the case of the petitioner sympathetically taking note of illness of son of the petitioner, who is required to be taken to Mohali frequently after 15 days for treatment. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. p (Sandeep Sharma), Judge August 28,2025 (shankar)