Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23484 (AP)

Midthipati Rama Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/21982/2020 · 2025-09-01

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010331312020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21982/2020 Between: 1. MIDTHIPATI RAMA RAO,, S/O LATE CHINA APPANNA, AGED 72 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O, DOOR NO.2-92, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, PATHAPET, NADURUBADA-533255, RAYAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, TULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE 2. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OR POLICE, ELURU RANGE, ELM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA, O/O. COLLECTORATE, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER/SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAYAVARAM POLICE STATION, RAYAVARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE 6. MIDTHIPATI SURYANARAYANA, S/O. PEDDA SURAYA RAO, AGED 40 YEARS, OCC.. CULTIVATION, R/O. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, PATHAPCT, NALURUBADA-533255, RAYAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, 7. MIDTHIPATI SURYA PRAKASH, S/O. MIDTHIPATI SURYANARAYANA AGED 19 YEARS, OCE.. CULTIVATION, WO. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, PATHAPET, NADURUBADA-533255, RAYAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 8. SEKHAR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. C/O. MIDTHIPATI SURYANARAYANA AGED. MAJOR, OCC.. NOT KNOWN, R/O. AMBETLKAR VEEDHI. PATHAPET, NADURUBADA- 533255, RAYAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 9. JAMI SITHARAMANJANEYULU, S/O RAMA RAO, AGED. 56 YEARS, R/O. NADURUBADA-533255, RAYAVARAM MANDAL, EAST 2 GODAVARI DISTRICT 10. SIRIPURAPU SRINIVASA RAO SIRIPURAPU SRINU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED. MAJOR, R/O, NADUNIBADA- 533255, RAYAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 11. MERALA KONDALA RAO, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED. MAJOR, R/O. NADURUBADA-533255, RAYAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 12. KOTHULA SIMHADRI, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED. MAJOR, R/O. NADURUBADA-533255, RAYAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 13. POTHULA GANGADARA VARA PRASAD PRASAD, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED. MAJOR. R/O. NADURUBADA-533255, RAYAVARAM MANDRIL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 14. KATTARI SRINU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED. MAJOR, R/O. VEDURUPAKA-533345, RAYAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 15. BANDARU KRISHNA GUDDI KISTAIAH, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. AGED. MAJOR, R/O. NADURUBADA-533255, RAYAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMA MURTY P V S A Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring aggrieved by the action of the Respondents 2 to 5 in not acted upon on Complaint dated 29.08.2020 made by the petitioner through Registered Post with acknowledgement due on 30.08.2020 against the Respondents 6 to 15 committed offence of causing death of Domestic/Pet animals pertains to the petitioner with an ultimatum of threat of dire consequences to the petitioners and his family at the immense support of the 5th Respondent and other higher officials despite receipt of the compliant on 03.10.2020 is arbitrary illegal capricious bias absurd and void and violative of provisions under sections of Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 and violative of provision of the prevention of cruelty of Animals Act 1960 and also violative of GaMS No.288 dated 06.11.2010 apart from violative of Article 14 19 21 300A and 350 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3 respondents to acted upon on compliant dated 28.09.2020 made by the Petitioner forthwith” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner herein is no more. 3. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that based on complaint given by the petitioner, police have registered a case in Crime No.180 of 2020 of Rayavaram Police Station, East Godavari District, for the offences punishable under Sections 429 read with 34 IPC. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:02.09.2025 Asr 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.21982 of 2020 Dt.02.09.2025 Asr