APHC010330392003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 10345/2003 Between: 1. MOTHUKURI NAGENDRA PRASAD., S/O LATE APPA RAO EX-BANK EMPLOYEE R/O RAYALAM VILLAGE, NEAR WATER TANK, BHIMAVARAM., WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. M. BHARATHI, W/O. LATE APPA RAO 2-14-8/B, RAMNIVAS, SREERAMPURAM, BHIMAVARAM, W.G. DISTRICT 3. M. NAGA TEJASWANI, D/O. LATE M.N. PRASAD REP. BY GUARDIAN PETITIONER NO.2 2-14-8/B, RAMNIVAS, SREERAMPURAM, BHIMAVARAM, W.G. DISTRICT 4. M. NAGA APARNA, D/O. LATE M.N. PRASAD REP. BY GUARDIAN PETITIONER NO.2 2-14-8/B, RAMNIVAS, SREERAMPURAM, BHIMAVARAM, W.G. DISTRICT PETITIONERS 2TO4 BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LRS OF DECEASED ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. DY G M VIJAYAWADA OTHER, (DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY) REGION - IV., ZONAL OFFICE., VIJAYAWADA-10 2. ASST GENERAL MANAGER, DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY.,S.B.I., REGION-IV, ZONAL OFFICE., VIJAYAWADA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue rulenisi calling for the records leading upto and inclusive of the impugned disciplinary proceedings No. DPS/DGM/557 dated 22-10-2002 issued by the Ist respondent by confirming the disciplinary proceedings No.DPSR -II/No.385 dated 12-8-2002 issued by the 2nd respondent, to issue any appropriate Writ, order or direction more especially in the nature of Writ of Certiorari for quashing the impugned proceedings No.DPS/DGM/557 dated 22-10-2002 issued by the Ist respondent by confirming the disciplinary proceedings No.DPSR-II/No.385 dated 12-8-2002 issued by the 2nd respondent and to pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 13006 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To reinstate the petitioner herein into service as clerk cum Cashier by suspending the impugned proceedings No.DPS/DGM/557 dated 22-10-2002 issued by the Ist respondent. IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP 16362 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to bring the petitioners 2 to 4 hereim i.e LRs of the deceased 1st petitioner as petitioners 2 to 4 int he above wp Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M ADINARAYANA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V UMA DEVI 2. 4118/M V K VISWANADHAM The Court made the following order: It is brought to the notice of this Court that, as the petitioner’s counsel died, this court ordered notice to the sole petitioners. The endorsement of the Registry shows that the notices sent were returned with the endorsement ‘No such person at the Door number’. When the matter is pending consideration, the petitioners shall invariably pursue the matter. Despite the same, it shows that the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the matter. Since the matter is of the year 2003 and the petitioners are having no interest in prosecuting the matter, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed for non- prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. If at the petitioners feels that the cause in the writ petition still survives, they shall move appropriate application within two(02) months. No costs. Miscellaneous applications pending if any shall stand closed. ______________________ RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J BRS