IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 103+206 Gurcharan Kaur Bakhshi State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) CM-6587-CWP application is allowed. person mentioned in para 3 of the of the petitioner, for the purpose of pursuing the present petition only. CWP-15343 1. respondents to pay the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Gurcharan Kaur Bakhshi Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Aryan Sharma, Advocate for Mr. C.S.Bakshi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Pun AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) CWP-2025 Learned State counsel has no objection, in case the present application is allowed. Accordingly, the present application is allowed and the person mentioned in para 3 of the application is of the petitioner, for the purpose of pursuing the present petition only. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. 15343-2000 Prayer made in the present case is for directing the respondents to pay the due retiral benefits to the petitioner. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-6587-CWP-2025 in/and CWP-15343-2000 (O & M) Date of decision: 07.05.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Aryan Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. Learned State counsel has no objection, in case the present Accordingly, the present application is allowed and the application is impleaded as legal heirs of the petitioner, for the purpose of pursuing the present petition only. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. Prayer made in the present case is for directing the retiral benefits to the petitioner. PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.08 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-15343-2000 -2- 2. Learned State counsel refers to para 1 of preliminary submissions of written statement filed on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, dated 15.03.2004, to state that all the retiral benefits stand released. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, refers to the replication filed to the same stating therein that there were some mistakes in the GPF statement. 4. In view of the above, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that LR of the petitioner may approach the respondents by filing a representation substantiating the errors, if any, which would be decided within 4 months of its receipt, which satisfies learned counsel opposite. 5. Disposed of accordingly. 07.05.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.08 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.