Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23477 (AP)

Dasari Eswarappa, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/19981/2021 · 2025-09-18

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010331692021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19981/2021 Between: 1. DASARI ESWARAPPA,, S/O. D. THIPPESWAMY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, RESIDING AT PILLALAPALLI VILLAGE, BRAHMASAMUDRAM MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. AND ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENTDENT OF POLICE, THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENTDENT OF POLICE, KALYANADURGAM, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, , RURAL POLICE STATION, KALYANADURGAM, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SESHADRI GOALLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent police in not taking steps to recover the theft vehicle JCB bearing No. AP02 CA 8308 though the petitioner have given specific information about theft vehicle through his complaint dated 03.08.2021 as illegal, arbitrary and against their obligatory duties and consequently direct the 2 respondent police to recover the theft vehicle JCB bearing No.AP02 CA 8308.” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 19.09.2025 Asr 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19981 of 2021 Dt.19.09.2025 Asr