SMT VIMLA SAVALKA WIFE OF LATE SHRI VINOD KUMAR SAVALKA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/3978/2025 · 2025-07-31
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23473 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23473 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:29159] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3978/2025 Smt Vimla Savalka Wife Of Late Shri Vinod Kumar Savalka, Aged About 61 Years, Resident Of Flat No.- 806, Shivgyan Enclave, Gotam Marg, Nirman Nagar, Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan.
3. The Superintendent Of Police South, Jaipur (Raj).
4. Sho, Police Station, Ashok Nagar, District Jaipur City ( South).
5. Sho, Police Station, Jyoti Nagar, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP with Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 31/07/2025
1. Present petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS for fair investigation of the FIR No. 250/2024 registered at Police Station Ashok Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences under Section 318(4), 316(2) and 336(2) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a senior citizen, who has been deprived from her husband's property by close family members.
3. Additionally, it is submitted that petitioner has filed a representation (Annexure 2) with a plea for fair investigation. However, same was not considered till date.
[2025:RJ-JP:29159] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3978/2025]
4. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstance of the case, this Court, in light of the directions encapsulated in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2008) 2 SCC 409], directs that on 04.08.2025, the petitioner shall mark his presence before concerned DCP, Jaipur (South) who shall give audience to the petitioner and take appropriate decision, strictly in accordance with law.
5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /47