Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23470 (KAR)

M/S SREE BHRAVESHWARA ELECTRICAL WORKS v. THE BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED (BESCOM)

WP/10812/2025 · 2025-06-16

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20585 WP No. 10812 of 2025 C/W WP No. 10813 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 10812 OF 2025 (GM-TEN) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 10813 OF 2025 (GM-TEN) IN WP No. 10812/2025 BETWEEN: M/S. SREE BHYARAVESHWARA ELECTRICAL WORKS, REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SMT. ROOPA B.L, W/O. ANAND MUDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, BUILDING FLAT NO. SPL 3, LOKIKERE ROAD, INDUSTRIAL AREA, DAVANAGERE - 577 005. IT IS REGISTERED UNDER INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT 1932 SEC58(1) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIJAYA RAGHAVA SARATHY H.M, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED (BESCOM), REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, CORPORATE OFFICE, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by VIDYA G R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20585 WP No. 10812 of 2025 C/W WP No. 10813 of 2025 2. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (OPERATIONS-1), THE BENGALURU ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED (BESCOM), CORPORATE OFFICE, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SUMANA NAGANAND, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A. QUASHING TENDER NOTIFICATION BEARING BESCOM/2024-25/SEO198, DATED 24-10-2024 (ANNEXURE-B) AS IT PERTAINS TO CHANDAPURA CENTER, CHANDAPURA DIVISION ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER AND ETC., IN WP NO. 10813/2025 BETWEEN: M/S. SREE BHYARAVESHWARA ELECTRICAL WORKS, REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SMT. ROOPA B.L, W/O. ANAND MUDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, BUILDING FLAT NO. SPL 3, LOKIKERE ROAD, INDUSTRIAL AREA, DAVANAGERE - 577 005. IT IS REGISTERED UNDER INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT 1932 SEC58(1) ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. V.R. SARATHY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20585 WP No. 10812 of 2025 C/W WP No. 10813 of 2025 COMPANY LIMITED (BESCOM), REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, CORPORATE OFFICE, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (OPERATIONS-1), THE BENGALURU ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED (BESCOM), CORPORATE OFFICE, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560 001. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SUMANA NAGANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) QUASH TENDER NOTIFICATION BEARING BESCOM/2024-25/SEO201, DATED 24/10/2024 (ANNX-B) AS IT PERTAINS TO HONNALI TALUK, HARIHARA DIVISION IS CONCERNED ISSUED BY THE R2 DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER AND ETC., THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for disposal which reads as hereunder: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20585 WP No. 10812 of 2025 C/W WP No. 10813 of 2025 "The Petitioner submits that though the Tender Notification is issued on 25-07-2024 as per Rule-22 of the KTTP Rules 2000 the Tender evaluation as well as award has to be completed within 90 days from the date of tender notification whereas in the present case the 2nd even after lapse of 90 days in so for as it pertains to Davanagere Taluk. The Petitioner has challenged the similar tender notification in W.P.No.9975/2025(GM-Ten). This Hon'ble Court interpreting clause 7.0 as the bid validity shall be valid for 180 days from the date of opening of techno-commercial bids and further considering the fact that the petitioner is not participated in the tender and wanting to call in question the process of tender cannot be seen possessing locus to challenge the same and thus dismissed the writ petition on 26th April 2025. A copy of the said order is produced herewith and marked as Annexure:-E. In view of the same the present writ petition is also assailing the very same notification and very same ground and hence the present petition should also be dismissed in terms of the order passed in W.P.No.9975/2025 in the interest of justice and equity." - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20585 WP No. 10812 of 2025 C/W WP No. 10813 of 2025 In light of the same, both the petitions are dismissed as not calling for adjudication. SD/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 98