tL= LidJid lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT Between : AM ARAVA MONDAY, THE' SEVENTH DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6855 OF 2025 r,, Budha Ram, s/o Narana Ram @ Narayanaram, aged 30 years, Residing at Bhateep Village, Pamana Post, Raniwara Sub District, Jalor District, Rajasthan State. petitioner/Accused-1 AND -1' The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High court Of Andhra Pradesh. v/ ...Respondent/Complainant • -t``) -t petition under section 483 (1) of BNSS 2023 (Old Sect'lon 439 (1) of cr.p.c), praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support Of the Criminal Petition, the H'lgh Court may be pleased to modify the Order Passed by the Special Judge for Trial of Cases under NDPS Act Gum-1 Additional Dlstrict & Sessions Judge, Visakhaptnam in crI.M.P No.1131/2025 in Crime No. 77/2O25 of Gopalapatnam PoI'lce station, visakahapatnam dated o5-05-2025 by considering the Situation Of the petitioner/Accused No.1 as petitioner 1 to be released On bail On executing a •\+i. . self bond for Rs 10, 000/ Rupees Ten Thousand only With Single Surety -Instead of pet'ltioner/Al to be released On ball On executing a Self bond for R§ 50,000/ Rupees Fifty Thousand only With two Sureties and the Sureties must be local persons and permit the petitloner/Accused No 1 to deposit the Surety bond amount of Rs 10 000/ with sin`gle Surety instead Of Rs 50, 000/ with two suret-les. counsel forthe Petition6r : Sri Kakumanu Joji Amrutha Raju I { counsel for the Respondent : Assistant Public Prosecutor. The Court made the following O~RDERl[ I l -|,. _. €' 't-.\'._ \ -\\\` ,-rty--_ - APliCOIO331582O25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (special Original JurI-SdictI'On) [3327] MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENfVASA REDDY Between : Budha Ram ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT The state ofAndhra pradesh counsel for the petI-tiOner/accused: ----I `ll'n" 1. KAKUMANU JOJI AMRUTHA RAJU counsel for the Respondent/complaf-nant.I 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The court made the following: QBBEB± The crjmlnaI Petl|tion I-S filed on behalf of the petI'tI-Oner herein/Al to modlfy the order dated o5 05 2025 ln crI.M.P No 1131 of 2025 passed by the learned I Additional Dl'strict & sessions Judge-Gum- speclaI Judge for Trlal of offences under the NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam. _-_ ----_.-------.-------__ 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent/state. perused the record. 3. Originally, the petitioner herein fI-led a petl'tion for grant ofregular bail in crime No.77 of 2025 of Gopalapatnam police station. By an Order, dated o5.05.2025, the learned Special Judge for Trial of offences under the NDPS Act, Visakhapatnam allowed the said petition by imposing certain conditions. Aggrieved by the said conditions imposed by the learned special Judge, the petitioner herein filed the present criminal petition to modify the conditions l'mposed by the learned Special Judge a{ the time of granting bail. 4. It is submitted that despite grant of bail on o5.05.2025 by the learned Special Judge, the petitioner could not furnI'Sh Sureties for Rs.50,000/- with two sureties to the satisfaction of the learned lI Additional chief Judicial Magistrate, visakhapatnam. He further contends that the petitioner belongs to a poor family, eking out his livelihood by doing coolie work and due to the said reason, the petitioner js unable to furnish the sureties for Rs.50,000/-, and though bail was granted on o5.05.2025, the petitioner could not furnish the , sureties and has been languishing I'n jail and requests the Court to consider his case on humanitarian grounds. __ __.._--------.-....-----.--_ I ''--_ ': -'- tl*t`=` - Z.7' To, 5. In viewofthe aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to modify I.he condition imposed in the order dated 05.05.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.1131 of 2025 passed by the learned Special Judge. 6. ln the resu_lt, the criminal petitI'On iS allowed and the petitioner herein shall be released on bail on his execution of personal bond for Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned ll Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Visakhapatnam. It ,is made clear that the other conditions imposed by the learned Special Judge, shall remain same. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. I.`L sD/-P.VINOD KUiriAR E] i ASSISTANT R STRAP Fort ll+kuE COPYIl \`-_ SECTION OFFICER 1. The I Additional District & Ses;ion Judge-Gum-Special Judge for Trial of' Offences under NDPS Act: Visakhapatnam. 2, The ll Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Visakhapatnam. I 3. The Station House Officer, Gopalapatnam Police Station, Visakhapatnam Commissioherate. 4. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District. 5. One CC {o Sri Kakumanu j'ojI-+Amrutha Raju, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor`,`High Court ofAndhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. One spare copy CVSS HIGH COURT SRK,J DATED.. 07/07/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.6855 of 2025 ALLOWED