APHC010330562019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 15696/2019 Between: 1. DHAVILESWARAPU VEERABRAHMANANDA SWAMY, S/O. SUBBA RAO (LATE), HINDU, MALE, AGED 44 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.19-11-1/13, MUTCHIMILLI ROAD, RAMAMACHANDRAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. DHAVILESWARAPU SURYAVATHI, W/O. LATE. SUBBA RAO, HINDU, FEMALE, AGED 62 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.19-11-1/13, MUTCHIMILLI ROAD, RAMAMACHANDRAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. DHAVILESWARAPU ESWARI,, D/O. SUBBA RAO (LATE), HINDU, FEMALE, AGED 27 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.19-11-1/13, MUTCHIMILLI ROAD, RAMAMACHANDRAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY (HOME DEPARTMENT) SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER WOMEN POLICE STATION, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 4. MEDIKONDUR VENKAT SARITHA DEVI, D/O. M. PARABRAHMACHARI, HINDU, FEMALE, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.10-2-6, SAMBASIVAPET, 2ND LINE, KOTHAPET, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.15696 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 and his sub-ordinates in trying to take us into their custody without registration of the crime under any provision of law and issuing notice Date 20.09.2019 for conducting counseling as illegal, irregular, arbitrary, violative of provisions of Criminal Procedure Code, and also offends Articles, 14, 21 of Indian Constitution and consequently direct the official Respondents not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner without following due process of law contemplated under section 41-A of the CR.P.C. and pass…” 2. Learned counsel representing Sri Mangena Sree Rama Rao, learned counsel for the writ petitioners would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. Recording the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 04.09.2025 Pmk 5 34 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:15696 OF 2019 Date: 04.09.2025 Pmk