Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23458 (RAJ)

RAM NIWAS MEENA v. STATE OF RAJ AND ANR

CW/13169/2017 · 2025-02-12

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6197] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13169/2017 Ram Niwas Meena, S/o Shri Jawahar Lal Meena, R/o Village Gunavta, Post Labana, Tehsil Amer District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Its Managing Director, Jaipur City Transport Service Limited, Parivahan Marg Jaipur. 2. Chief Manager, Jaipur City Transport Service Limited, Vidhyadhar Nagar Depot, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Brijesh Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr.Sandeep Pathak JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 12/02/2025 1. The petitioner admittedly is working on the post of conductor with the Jaipur City Transport Service Limited, his services have been terminated vide order dated 29.05.2014. After conducting an enquiry, the petitioner comes within the definition of workman in terms of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and can therefore, raise a dispute in relation to his termination. 2. The fairness of the enquiry and the other aspects can be effectively examined by the Tribunal/ concerned Labour Court. 3. In view of the statutory remedy available with the petitioner, this court does not find it proper to entertain the writ petition. If, the petitioner raises his dispute before the concerned Labour Court relating to termination, it is expected from the concerned Labour Court to decide the dispute directly treating it as a [2025:RJ-JP:6197] (2 of 2) [CW-13169/2017] reference and disposed of the same expeditiously, nor later than ten months. 4. The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations. 5. Stay application and all application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /181