Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23456 (CHH)

M/S LANDMARK ENGINEER v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/529/2025 · 2025-06-11

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.1 of 2 IN MCC-529-2025 2025:CGHC:23403 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 529 of 2025 1 - M/s Landmark Engineer Through The Proprietor Nishant Jain, S/o Shri Suresh Chandra Jain, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Siddh Shikhar Apartment, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay New Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Executive Engineer Public Works Department Khairagarh Division District Khairagarh Chuikhadan-Gandai Chhattisgarh. ... Non-applicant [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant : Mr. Brajendra Singh, Advocate For Non-applicant : Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, Panel Lawyer ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 12 . 06 .202 5 1. Heard on IA No.01, which is an application filed under Section 05 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of delay of 71 days in filing the present restoration application (MCC). 2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, I am of considered opinion that the applicant has shown sufficient cause in filing this restoration application (MCC) with a delay of 71 days and, accordingly, the same is liable to be condoned. SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN Date: 2025.06.12 17:32:03 +0530 Page No.2 of 2 IN MCC-529-2025 3. Consequently, the delay of 71 days in filing this restoration application (MCC) is hereby condoned. IA No.01 is allowed. 4. Also heard on admission. 5. The application being arguable is admitted for hearing. 6. Issue notice to the non-applicant. Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the non-applicant accepts notice. 7. With the consent of the parties, heard finally. 8. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of CR-6-2019, which was dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 04.02.2025. 9. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. CR-6-2019 is restored to its original number for hearing and disposal in accordance with law subject to payment of cost of Rs.2,000/- (Rupees Two Thousand Only) before the Chhattisgarh High Court Legal Services Committee and file poof thereof within 15 days from today. It is made clear that failure to deposit amount of cost by the applicant within stipulated time, will lead to automatic dissolution of this order. 10. Accordingly, the MCC allowed. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if