IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 13363 of 2025 Date of Decision: 20.08.2025 _______________________________________________________ Dr. Mridul Jaswal …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Arun Raj, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent- State. Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, respondent No.2. Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India, for the respondent-Union of India. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner fairly states that with the efflux of time, present petition has been rendered infructuous and as such, same may be disposed of. Ordered accordingly. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge August 20, 2025 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?