Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23440 (KAR)

SRI.NATESH M N v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

WP/10538/2025 · 2025-04-29

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:17694 WP No. 10538 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 10538 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI NATESH M N, S/O SRI NAGARAJ M.P., AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1628, 5TH CROSS, HOSAKERI, K R MOHALLA, MYSURU - 570004. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVARAJU H B.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KSRTC, TRANSPORT HOUSE CENTRAL OFFICE, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-27. 2. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, KSRTC, RAMANAGARA DIVISION, KSRTC BUS STOP, RAMANAGARA-562159. 3. THE DEPUTY MANAGER, KSRTC, RAMANAGARA DIVISION, KSRTC BUS STOP, RAMANAGARA-562159. 4. SRI. K. UMESH, S/O KARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, NO.27, INDIRANAGAR, JALAMANGALA ROAD, IJOOR, RAMANAGARA-562159. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT H.R RENUKA.,ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3) Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:17694 WP No. 10538 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE R2 TO THE PETITIONER VIDE NO. KARASA/RANAVI/NO.VAA/13/25-26 DTD 02.04.25 DEMANDING A SUM OF RS.65,57,217/- ALONG WITH INTEREST TO BE PAID WITHIN 09.04.25 VIDE ANNX-G. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner after having the matter at length would restrict his prayer to consideration of the representation submitted by the petitioner vide Annexure-F. 2. The learned counsel Smt. H.R. Renuka, representing the respondent submits that even consideration of the representation should not be granted in the case at hand, as the petitioner has not even paid the licence fee. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:17694 WP No. 10538 of 2025 3. Be that as it may, the respondent-Corporation is at liberty to consider the representation-Annexure-F and pass necessary orders in accordance with law. 4. With the above said observation, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE CHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42