- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21900 RSA No. 501 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.501 OF 2021 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. CHIKKAMMA, W/O LATE DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS. 2. SMT. SHIVAMMA, W/O THIMMMANNA, D/O LATE DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. 3. BASAVARAJU, S/O LATE DODDIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS. APPELLANTS NO.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT KURIHALLI VILLAGE, C.N. DURGA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 129. 4. SMT. GANGAMMA, W/O MANJUNATHA, D/O LATE DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O THOVINAKERE VILALGE, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572 138. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. RAMESH K.R., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21900 RSA No. 501 of 2021 AND: 1. SMT. BASAMMA, D/O LATE DODDAIAH, W/O DODDA THIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O HANUMANTHARAYANAPALYA VILLAGE, DODDERI HOBI, MADHUGIRI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572112. 2. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA, W/O LATE GANGANNA, S/O LATE DODDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O KENCHENAHALLI VILLAGE, MAVINAKERE POST, BHADRAVATHI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577245. 3. SRI. D. BASAVARAJU, S/O LATE DODDASIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS. 4. SRI. HENJARAPPA, S/O LATE DODDASIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS. 5. SRI. D. SHIVAKUMARA, S/O LATE DODDASIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS. 6. SRI. D. SIDDESHA, S/O LATE DODDASIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. RESPONDENTS NO.3 TO 6 ARE R/AT KURIHALLI VILLAGE, C.N. DURGA HOBLI, KORATAGERE TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT-572129. …RESPONDENTS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21900 RSA No. 501 of 2021 THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.10.2020 PASSED IN R.A.NO.5022/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, TUMAKURU, SITTING AT MADHUGIRI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE AND MODIFYING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.07.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.19/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MADHUGIRI. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL JUDGMENT The learned counsel for the appellants submits that inspite of instruction is given to the counter part advocate, who represents on behalf of the appellants before the Trial Court, he is not responding and not furnished the corrected copy of the OS judgment and also not given the cost to make the payment to comply with the order dated 10.06.2025. 2. The submission of the learned counsel for the appellants is taken on record. 3. In view of non-payment of cost and non- compliance of office objection, the appeal is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5