Page No.# 1/3 GAHC020006922022 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/270/2022 SHRI. LIPIKYU SANGTAM AND ANR AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, S/O KYUMUSHUM, R/O KIPHIRE VILLAGE, KIPHIRE - 798611, NAGALAND 2: SMTI. LITONGLA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS W/O SHRI. ALISON R/O KIPHIRE VILLAGE KIPHIRE -- 798611 NAGALAN VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 6 ORS THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF NAGALAND, NAGALAND, KOHIMA 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KIPHIRE NAGALAND 3:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KIPHIRE NAGALAND 4:SHRI. LITHSITHRONG Page No.# 2/3 S/O LATE LITSASE R/O KIPHIRE VILLAGE KIPHIRE - 798611 NAGALAND 5:SHRI. CHOTSIBA GRANDSON OF LATE THSILONGSE R/O KIPHIRE VILLAGE KIPHIRE - 798611 NAGALAND 6:SHRI. THRILICHO GRANDSON OF LATE THSILONGSE R/O KIPHIRE VILLAGE KIPHIRE - 798611 NAGALAND 7:SHRI. CHOTHRONGSE GRANDSON OF LATE THSILONGSE R/O KIPHIRE VILLAGE KIPHIRE - 798611 NAGALAN Advocate for the Petitioner : SENTIYANGER, CHUBA IMCHEN,V ANNE THERIE,KONLI BUCHEM Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER 17.04.2025 Mr. Sentiyanger, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the first prayer of the petitioners have been complied with by the State respondents he is not pressing for the second prayer, the matter has become infructuous therefore, prays that the matter be disposed of on becoming infructuous. Ms. Livika, learned Government Advocate appears on behalf of the State respondents and Mr. P. Surien, learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent Nos. 4 to 7. In view of above, the writ petition is closed on becoming infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant