[2025:RJ-JP:1282] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 193/2025 Sanjit Kumar S/o Late Satish Shah, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Songar, Post Madhopur Dighrooa, Police Station Tajpur, District Samastipur, Bihar (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 09/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.383/2024 registered at Police Station Mahesh Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) (Raj.) for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4) & 316(2) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act. During investigation offences punishable under Sections 318(4) & 316(2) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act have been found proved against the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate and the phone which was used in this crime does not belong to the petitioner. Counsel submits that no recovery has been made from the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:1282] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-193/2025] Counsel further submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 17.12.2024 and trial will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. He submits that the amount of Rs.2,08,860/- (Two Lakh Eight Thousand Eight Hundred Sixty Rupees) has been transferred in the bank account of the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate; absence of criminal antecedents of the petitioner; period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Sanjit Kumar S/o Late Satish Shah shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall [2025:RJ-JP:1282] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-193/2025] mark his presence on first week of every month in the concerned police station. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /128