Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2343 (GAU)

MUTUM BISHAL SINGHA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/3007/2025 · 2026-01-27

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010280942025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/3007/2025 MUTUM BISHAL SINGHA S/O.- MUTUM BIREN SINGHA, R/O - 23A, BT ROAD, MANIPURI BASTI, P.O.- PALTANBAZAR, P.S. - PALTANBAZAR, DISTRICT - KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : H CHOUDHURY, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 28 .01. 2026 Heard Mr. H. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.S. Lahkar, learned Addl. P.P. for the State respondent. This application under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 filed by the petitioner, namely Mutum Bishal Singha, apprehending arrest in connection with All Women P.S. Case No. 87/2025 registered under Section 69 of BNS, 2023. Page No.# 2/2 The learned Addl. P.P. has submitted that the charge sheet has been submitted vide C.S. No. 74/2025, dated 30.12.2025 thereby indicating that the investigation of the case is over. Having regard to the nature of the allegations as indicated in the FIR, it is not considered necessary that the petitioner be remanded to custody. Therefore, the prayer for bail is allowed. In view of the above, interim order dated 19.12.2025 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions that:- (1) shall not hamper or tamper with the evidence of the case; and (2) the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or any other police officer. The bail application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant