Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
'Wk 1 V ■» k APHC010330462025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Sr^ THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 16438 OF 2025 Between:
1. Nagolu Suman, S/o.N.Raghurami Reddy Aged about 38 years, Occ Agriculture R/o.D.No.1-166, Uranduru Village Srikalahasti Mandal, Tirupati District
2. Nagolu Rama Subbamma, W/o. N.Raghurami Reddy Aged about 63 years, Occ Housewife R/o.D.No.1-166, Uranduru Village Srikalahasti Mandal, Tirupati District ...PETITIONERS AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Thullur Mandal, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Tirupati District. 3. The District Panchayat Officer, Tirupati District. 4. The Gram Panchayat, Rep. by Panchayat Secretary, Uranduru Village, Tirupati District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature
of Writ of Mandamus by declaring proceedings vide Re.K.No.02/2025/B2 the action of the respondents in issuing and their attempt and 268/7B of Uranduru Tirupati District without issuing any show cause petitioners ... , ^ ' d^ted 24.06.2025 0 demolish the sheds situated in Sy.No.268/7A . .tillage, Srikalahasti Mandal, notice or affording the arbitrary, unlawful, violative an opportunity of hearing, as illegal 14,21 and 300A the Constitution Raj Act, 1994, and Articles of India and consequently interdict the respondents from interfering with the petitioners possess,on and enjoyment over the said sheds situated in Sy.No.268/7A and o Uranduru Village, Srikalahasti Mandal, Tirupati District. jA NO: 1 OF 709*; Petition under Section 151 cPC in the affidavit filed r stay praying that in the circumstances stated in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to proceedings respondent including and 268/7B of Uranduru all further proceedings pursuant 24.06.2025 issued by 4 demoiition of the structures situated in Sy.No,268/7A Village, Srikalahasti Mandal, Tirupati District, to vide Re.K.No.02/2025/B2, dated Counsel for the Petitioners: Counsel for the Respondent Nos.
M/s. INDUS LAW FIRM 1 to 3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ rural development 4:SRI M. SUDHIR, SC FOR ZPP, gram PANCHAYAT & Counsel for the Respondent No. MPP& The Court made the following order:
APHC010330462025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 16438/2025 Between:
1.NAGOLU SUMAN, S/O.N.RAGHURAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE VILLAGE SRIKALAHASTI MANUAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT R/O.D.NO.1-166, URANDURU 2.NAGOLU RAMA SUBBAMMA, W/0. N.RAGHURAMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE R/O.D.NO.1-166, URANDURU VILLAGE SRIKALAHASTI MANUAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, THULLUR MANUAL, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT VELAGAPUDI DISTRICT. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3.THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 4.THE GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP. BY PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, URANDURU VILLAGE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S):
2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S)-. 1.M/S INDUS LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 1.GP FOR Court made the following: The ORALORDER: behalf of M/s. and Sri Panku Prasad, learned Counsel appearing on Counsel for the Writ Petitioners Pleader for Panchayat Raj. Heard Sri V.R.N Firm, learned learned Assistant Government Indus Law Rajesh Kumar,
2. Learned drawn the attention of this submits that the Impugned
directed to remove the such direction having been Counsel for the Writ Petitioners has dated 24.06.2025 (Ex.P.1)- He were orally Court to the Notice Notice indicates that the Writ Petitioners nauthorized structures The Petitioners deny any given by the Official Respondents earlier The Impugned Notice indicates that the alleged illegal constructions are removed within seven (07) days.
3.
directed to be ina considered the contents of the of the said Notice that the On the face of it, this Court, having Impugned Notice, is of the opinion that the contents orally directed is unsustainable in law.
4. Petitioners were the written Notice now issued by the Official shall be treated as a Show-Cause
directed to respond to the said Notice within a In this view of the matter 24.06.2025 and the Petitioners are period of three (03) weeks by submitting a
5. Respondents Notice on written explanation. details of the unauthorized detailed particulars of the not indicate all the at liberty to seek If the present Notice does the Petitioners are
6. structures, alleged illegal constructions. The Respondents are at liberty to act in accordance with law after the submit their explanation
7. Writ Petitioners
3 With these observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to
8. costs. Needless to state, until the Respondent Authorities pass a final Order, they are not entitled to take any coercive action against the Writ Petitioners. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
9.
10.
Sd/- K. SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ' SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi Thullur Mandal, Amaravati, Guntur District. The District Collector, Tirupati District. The District Panchayat Officer, Tirupati District. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Uranduru Village, Tirupati District. One CC to M/s. Indus Law Firm, Advocate [OPUC^ Onq^QC to Sri M. Sudhir, SC for ZPP, MPP & Gram Panchayat[OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj & Rural Development, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. ssb
i r A HIGH COURT DATED:03/07/2025
ORDER WP No.16438 OF 2025 inUL 2025 Co irrmt DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS