[2025:RJ-JP:29560] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 8555/2025 Satnam Singh S/o Sh. Baburam, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village And Post Dullewala, Police Station Dharmkot, District Monga, Punjab. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus CBN, Through Special PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vivek Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tej Prakash Sharma, Special PP for CBN with Mr. Vaibhav Jhankra HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 01/08/2025 1. This second bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.XV(7)5/Prev./Seiz/JPR/2024 registered at Police Station Central Bureau of Narcotic, District Jaipur (Raj.) for the offence punishable under Section 8/15 of the N.D.P.S. Act. 2. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the present matter is of bail jump. Counsel submits that benefit of bail was granted to petitioner by this Court vide order dated 13.12.2024 and while allowing the bail application, petitioner was directed to mark his presence in first week of every month in the Office of Central Bureau of Narcotic, Jaipur. Counsel submits that due to unavoidable circumstances, petitioner did not appear in the Office [2025:RJ-JP:29560] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8555/2025] of Bureau as ordered by this Court and aforesaid fact was informed by Central Bureau of Narcotic to the learned trial Court and submitted an application for cancellation of bail of the petitioner, which was allowed by the learned trial Court vide order dated 03.02.2025 as such, his bail bonds has been forfeited and warrant of arrest has been issued against him. It is submitted that petitioner is in custody since June, 2025. Counsel submits that the petitioner undertakes to appear in the Office of Central Bureau of Narcotic in first week of every month as well as before the learned trial Court on each and every date as fixed by the trial Court. He thus, prays that the instant bail application may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the overall facts & circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced at bar, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This second bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Satnam Singh S/o Sh. Baburam shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve [2025:RJ-JP:29560] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8555/2025] in any other criminal activity during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the office of the Bureau. 8. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 9. Concerned Officer of the Bureau is directed to maintain the record of presence of the petitioner and in case of any default, he will report the matter to the concerned Court immediately. 10. Bureau is at liberty to file application for cancellation of bail, if the petitioner does not mark his presence in the Office of Bureau and if he is found involvement in any other similar offence during the currency of bail. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /255