2025:HHC:22 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Exe. Pet. No.1137 of 2024 Decided on: 01.01.2025 Naresh Kumar … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Addl. AG for respondent No. 1. : Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for respondent No.2 informs the Court that reply to the petition has been filed. This fact is acknowledged by learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The Court further stands informed that the Authority has passed office order dated 17.12.2024, in favour of the petitioner. This fact is also acknowledged by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submits that the petition be disposed of with by granting reasonable time to the respondents to take further steps to ensure that the petitioner gets the benefits of the reliefs granted to him. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:22 4. Accordingly, these proceedings are closed. Let needful be done, within a period of three months from today. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 01, 2025 (narender)