Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23422 (AP)

Ghattamaneni Sumathi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/6821/2025 · 2025-07-21

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010330452025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6821/2025 Between: GHATTAMANENI SUMATHI, W/O MAHENDRA BABU, AGED 36 YEARS, R/O 3RD WARD, PETERU VILLAGE, REPALLE MANDAL, BAPATIA (ERSTWHILE GUNTUR) DISTRICT. GHATTAMANENI KRISHNA VENI, W/O MALLIKHARJUNA RAO, AGED 63 YEARS, R/O 3RD WARD, PETERU VILLAGE, REPALLE MANDAL, BAPATIA (ERSTWHILE GUNTUR) DISTRICT. GHATTAMANENI MAHENDRA BABU, , S/O MALLIKHARJUNA RAO, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O 3RD WARD, PETERU VILLAGE, REPALLE MANDAL, BAPATIA (ERSTWHILE GUNTUR) DISTRICT GHATTAMANENI MALLIKHARJUNA RAO, S/O BAPANAIAH, AGED 72 YEARS, R/O 3RD WARD, PETERU VILLAGE, REPALLE MANDAL, BAPATIA (ERSTWHILE GUNTUR) DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Through Station House Officer, Repalle Police Station, Bapatia District, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Amaravati ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay be pleased to grant them Anticipatory Bail by ordering them enlargement in the event of their arrest in connection with FIR No.113 of 2025 of Repalle Police Station, Bapatla District, on such terms and conditions as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and to pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant the Petitioners Interim Anticipatory Bail by directing the police not to arrest the petitioners in connection with FIR No. 113 of 2025 of Repalle Police Station, Bapatia District, during the pendency of the main Criminal Petition, on such terms and conditions as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. K JYOTHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri K.Jyothi Prasad, the learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the investigating officer has served a notice contemplated under Section 35(3) of ‘the BNS’/41-A of ‘the Cr.P.C’. Hence, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present Criminal Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. In view of the above, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 22.07.2025 SCS 3 113 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.6821 of 2025 Date:22.07.2025 SCS