- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19018 RFA No. 416 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 416 OF 2017 (MON) BETWEEN: SRI. V.SUBRAMANI @ MUNISWAMY, S/O SRI.VARADARAJU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, NO.105, PIPELINE ROAD, J.C.NAGAR, KURUBARAHALLI, BANGALORE-560 086. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. B.JANARDHANA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT] AND: SRI. D.B.MALLIKARJUNA SWAMY S/O SRI.D.S.BASETTAPPA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, NO.275, 17TH MAIN, (SOCIETY LAYOUT), GANGONDANAHALLI, CHANDRA LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 040. …RESPONDENT (HELD SUFFICIENT-V/O DATED:22.09.2021) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED AS UNDER:: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19018 RFA No. 416 of 2017 ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2017. Now we are in the month of June 2025. The appeal is pending from eight years. As already noted above, though matter called twice, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18