Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2342 (UTT)

MANOJ MALIK ALIAS MANOJ KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY HOME GOVT OF U.K. DEHRADUN

C482/182/2023 · 2025-03-28

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS C482 No.182 of 2023 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate for the applicant. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal B.H. for the State. 3. Mr. Jitendra Chaudhary, Advocate for respondent no.2. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant made a statement at bar that he has no instructions, in the present matter; therefore, this Court has no option but to dismiss the present C482 application. 5. Accordingly, the C482 application is dismissed for non- prosecution. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 28.03.2025 SK