Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23414 (GAU)

SHRI VIKAHO T. ZHIMO AND ANR v. STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/258/2024 · 2025-04-24

Suman Shyam

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC020006882024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/258/2024 SHRI VIKAHO T. ZHIMO AND ANR GB OF SHEYIPU VILLAGE AND LANDOWNER OF DISTRICT SPORTS, ZUNHEBOTO, NAGALAND 2: SMTI. HOLOKALI L. SHOHE WIFE OF VIKAHO T. ZHIMO OF SHEYIPU VILLAGE ZUNHEBOTO NAGALAN VERSUS STATE OF NAGALAND AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF NAGALAND 2:THE SECRETARY DEPT. OF YOUTH RESOURCES AND SPORTS NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:THE DIRECTOR DEPT. OF YOUTH RESOURCES AND SPORTS NAGALAND KOHIMA 4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ZUNHEBOTO NAGALAND 5:SMTI. PUKHALI V. MURU MULTI-TASKING STAFF DISTRICT SPORTS OFFICE ZUNHEBOTO NAGALAN Advocate for the Petitioner : Z. ZHIMOMI, S K ACHUMI,T. SHANGCHIU,ABEL AYEMI Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER Date : 25/04/2025 Ms. Z. Zhimomi, learned counsel for the writ petitioners submits that due to some subsequent developments, which need to be incorporated in the challenge made in the writ petition, the petitioners seek leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty file afresh. The prayer is not opposed by Ms. Pichano, learned Government Advocate, Nagaland, appearing for the official respondents as well as Mr. Pfosekhi Pfotte, learned counsel for the private respondents. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal with liberty, as prayed for. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant