Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23414 (CHH)

RAVINDRA SINGH THAKUR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1688/2025 · 2025-06-09

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:22855 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1688 of 2025 1 - Ravindra Singh Thakur S/o Shri Sadhu Singh Thakur Aged About 32 Years Caste- Rajput, R/o Village- Pathera, Tahsil- Kanina, P.S.- Mahendragarh, District- Mahendragarh, Haryana (Detail Of The Applicant Have Not Mentioned In Annexure A-1) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police Station- Kukanar, District- South Bastar, Dantewada (C.G.) ... Respondent For Petitioner : None. For Respondent/State : Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 10.06.2025 1. This is an office reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 08.11.2024 passed in MCRC No. 7203 of 2024, while allowing the bail to the applicant, namely, Ravindra Singh Thakur, had expressed its trust that the trial Court should make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Date: 2025.06.16 12:20:03 +0530 2 impediment. 3. The learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), South Bastar Dantewada District- South Bastar Dantewada (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 09.05.2025 has requested for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 4. It transpires from perusal of the PUD, that in the present case, there are 03 prosecution witnesses in this case and they all are resident of Hariyana State and it is likely to take time to ensure their presence therefore, they are remained to be examined. Considering the numbers of witnesses, the trial is likely to take some more time for its conclusion. Hence, he prays for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 5. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of three months from today. 6. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 7. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaishali