APHC010331112020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21969/2020 Between: 1. PERUMALLA IMMANUEL,, S/O PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC PASTOR, R/O. MACHAYAPALEM VILLAGE, BELLAMKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BELLAMKONDA POLICE STATION, BELLAMKONDA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. T MASTAN, TAHSILDAR, AGED ABOUT NOT KNOW TO THE PETITIONER, BELLAMKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. PERUMALLA RANI, W/O IMMANUEL, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. CHANDRAJUPALEM VILLAGE, BELLAMKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in 2 nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of the 3rd respondent in acting upon the petitioner's complaint, dated 27-10-2020 against respondent No.4 and 5 in conducting preliminary enquiry, registering a crime and investing or refused the complaint is as arbitrary, illegal, abdication of the statutory duty cast on him and violate the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.3 act upon the compliant, dated 27-10-2020 lodged by the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased forthwith direct the respondent No.3 act upon the compliant, dated 27-10¬2020 lodged by the petitioner and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G KONDALA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on the part of the 3rd respondent in acting upon the petitioner's complaint, dated 27-10-2020 against respondent No.4 and 5 in conducting preliminary enquiry, registering a crime and investing or refused the complaint is as arbitrary, illegal, abdication of the statutory duty cast on him and violate the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.3 act upon the compliant, dated 27-10-2020 lodged by the petitioner and pass……” 2. Sri G.Kondala Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as per the instructions from the party, they wanted to withdraw this Writ Petition. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 03.09.2025 MH 4 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 20 WRIT PETITION NO: 21969/2020 Dt.03.09.2025 MH 6