Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23405 (AP)

CH.SUBBIREDDY & ANOTHER v. P.C.B.BAYANNA

SA/701/2002 · 2025-06-24

B V L N Chakravarthi

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010330112002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE 1 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 701 OF 2002 Appeal Under Section 100 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree dated 19.06.2002 made in A.S.No.26 of 1998 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Proddutur, Guddapah District. Preferred against the Decree in O.S.No.188 of 1994 dated 20.08.1998 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Proddutur. Between: 1. Chall Subbireddy, Son of Pedda Subbireddy, Hindu, 79 years, Cultivation, Annapusastrulapalli, Duvvuru Mandal, Cuddapah District. 2. Challa Ram Subbareddy, Son of Chinna Subbireddy, Hindu, Aged 46 years. Cultivation, resident of Annapusastrulapalli, Duvvuru Mandal, Cuddapah District. ...Plaintiffs/Appellants/Appellants AND Pogula Chinna Boyina Bayanna, Son of Ganganna, Hindu, 43 years Cultivation, R/o Annapusastrulapalli, Duvvuru Mandal, Cuddapah District. ...Defendant/Respondent/Respondent / Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI KARRI MURALI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI G RAMACHANDRA REDDY The Court made the following JUDGMENT: % APHC010330112002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3368] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 701/2002 Between: ...APPELLANT Ch.subbireddy & Another AND ...RESPONDENT P C B Bayanna Counsel for the Appellant: 1. KARRI MURALI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent: 1.G RAMACHANDRA REDDY The Court made the following: % t THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL No.701 OF 2002 JUDGMENT: Notice taken to the 1®* appellant is not yet returned. Notice taken to the 2^^ appellant retuned as ‘died’. 2. No representation on either side, though the matter is posted under the caption “for dismissal”. Earlier also, there was no representation for the appellants. 3. In that view of the matter, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, The Senior Civil Judge, Proddutur, Cuddapah District, (with records) The Principal Junior Civil Judge, Proddutur, Cuddapah District. One CC to Sri. Karri Murali Krishna, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. G Ramachandra Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Three CD Copies 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. sree HIGH COURT DATED:25/06/2025 JUDGMENT SA 701/2002 ■\ OF 0" S 11 SEf 2025 % % ^ ^ Current iiecuon ^ ^^!£spatcv^ DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS