Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23401 (RAJ)

ANIL KUMAR RACHETA AND ORS v. STATE MEDICAL AN HEALT DEPT ORS

CW/1257/2017 · 2025-03-06

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:10234] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1257/2017 1. Anil Kumar Racheta, S/o Bajranglal Racheta, aged 32 years, Resident of C-133, Racheta Mansion, Todi Nagar, Sikar 2. Suresh Kumar Saini, S/o Banwarilal Saini, aged 31 years, Resident of Ganeri, Tehsil Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar 3. Dev Prakash Verma S/o Anand Swaroop Verma, aged 46 years, Resident of Shastri Nagar, Ward No. 26, Rani Sati Road, Sikar 4. Harish Kumar Ola, S/o Banwarilal Ola, aged 30 years, Resident of Kisan Colony, Nawalgarh Road, Sikar 5. Kamal Kumar Joshi S/o Ramawtar Joshi, aged 38 years, R/o Ward No. 22, Near Shyam Temple, Narodra Gate, Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar 6. Shyam Sunder Parnami, S/o Chouthmal Parnami, aged 32 years, R/o H.No 4/74, Housing Board, Devipura Bus Stand, Sikar 7. Manish Kumar Sharma S/o Late Mahaveer Prasad Sharma, aged 30 years, R/o Sobharam Ki Dhani, Goriya, Sikar 8. Bajranglal, S/o Ghadasi Ram, aged 30 years, R/o 290 Bajiya Ke Dhani, Piprali, Dist. Sikar 9. Shivani Kaushik, S/o Naresh Kumar Kaushik, aged 30 years, R/o Ward No. 04, Khetri, Dist. Jhunjhunu 10. Prakash Chandra Sharma, S/o Sanwar Mal Sharma, aged 54 years, R/o Near Ram Sati Mandir, Station Road, Ward No.29, Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar 11. Rajendra Singh S/o Ugam Singh, aged 39 years, R/o 2-B- 30 Ganesh Path, Ram Nagar, Sodala, Jaipur 12. Vinod Chirania, S/o Bal Kishan Chirania, aged 35 years, R/o Near Khatu Ki Kui, Ward No.16, Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar 13. Subhash Soni, S/o Om Prakash Soni, aged 38 years, R/o Ward No. 6, Sikar Road, Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar 14. Kamal Kumar Pareek S/o Dwarka Prasad Pareek, aged 38 years, R/o Mawalion Ki Dhani, Kumas Jatan, Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar [2025:RJ-JP:10234] (2 of 3) [CW-1257/2017] 15. Ashok Kumar Sharma S/o Jagdish Prasad Sharma, aged 46 years, R/o Vpo Tapiplya, Via Ringus, Tehsil Srimadhopur, Dist. Sikar 16. Jugal Kishor, S/o Puranmal Sharma, aged 34 years, R/o Vpo Nechhwa, Tehsil Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar 17. Bhanwar Singh Shekhawat S/o Mool Singh Shekhawat, aged 45 years, R/o Bharija,mandha-Surera, Dist. Sikar 18. Dinesh Kumar Jangid, S/o Chiranjilal Jangid, aged 33 years, R/o Mangluna, Tehsil Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar 19. Kishanlal Goyal, S/o Girdharilal Tailor, aged 42 years, R/o Sanwali Petrol Pump, Sikar 20. Mukesh Kumar Khindhi, S/o Ganpat Rai Khindhi, aged 35 years, R/o Near Head Post Office, Laxmantgarh, Dist. Sikar 21. Natwar Kumar Mishra, S/o Ganesh Kumar Mis,hra aged 31 years, R/o Near Kesri Nandan Hanuman Mandir, Ward No.17, Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar 22. Vijay Kumar Bagari, S/o Om Prakash Bagari, aged 35 years, R/o Near Head Post Office, Ward No.18, Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar 23. Pradeep Kumar Jangid, S/o Om Prakash Jangid, aged 30 years, R/o Neem Ka Thana, Dist. Sikar 24. Mahendra Kumar, S/o Puranmal Bhargav, aged 32 years, R/o Near Government Hospital, Ward No.13, V.p. Sirohi, Sikar 25. Nand Kishore Saini, S/o Bhairavlal Saini, aged 32 years, R/o Vpo Bhagera, Tehsil Kekri, Dist. Ajmer 26. Yakub Gauri, S/o Shamshuddin Gauri, aged 43 years, R/o Dakaniya Ka Mandir, Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Mission Director, Health Society National Rural Health Mission, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur 3. State Institute Of Health And Family Welfare, Rajasthan Through Director, Jhalana Institutional Area, South Of Doordarshan, Jaipur-302004 [2025:RJ-JP:10234] (3 of 3) [CW-1257/2017] 4. Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanmay Dhand For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 06/03/2025 This writ petition is disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by learned counsels for the respective parties: The petitioners would be paid a minimum of the pay scale of the post of Accountant in terms of judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab and Others Vs. Jagjit Singh and others: (2017) 1 SCC 148 within a period of twelve weeks from the date of communication of this order. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J YOGESH/150