Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23393 (GAU)

SMTI AMENA KHATUM v. STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS

I.A.(Crl.)/30/2025 · 2025-09-23

Manish Choudhury, Yarenjungla Longkumer

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC020006072025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/30/2025 SMTI AMENA KHATUM WIFE OF SHRI SADAM HUSSAIN, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF TENGATAL, PANCHAMUKHI, GOLAGHAT DISTRICT, ASSAM. VERSUS STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF NAGALAND, NAGALAND KOHIMA 2:THE SPECIAL SECRETARY HOME DEPT. (POLITICAL BRANCH) NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER NIULAND NAGALAND-797112 4:UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE JOINT SECRETARY (PITNDPS) DEPT. OF REVENUE MINISTRY OF FINANCE ROOM NO. 202 JEEVAN TARA BUILDING 2ND FLOOR PARLIAMENT STREET-110001 NEW DELH Advocate for the Petitioner : POKYIM YADEN, Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER Date : 24-09-2025 [M. Choudhury, J] Heard Mr. Pokyim Yaden, learned counsel for the applicant- writ petitioner and Mr. V. Zhimomi, learned Government Advocate, Nagaland for the opposite party-respondent nos. 1, 2 & 3; and Mr. Yanger Wati, learned Central Government Counsel for the opposite party-respondent no. 4. 2. The instant application is preferred by the applicant-writ petitioner seeking amendments in the accompanying writ petition, W.P.[Crl.] no. 18/2025. 3. The applicant-writ petitioner has averred that during the pendency of the writ petition, the opposite party-respondent no. 1 has confirmed the Detention Order dated 05.06.2025 by a subsequent Confirmation Order dated 08.09.2025. As the Confirmation Order dated 08.09.2025 is not part of the accompanying writ petition, the instant application has been filed seeking amendment in the accompanying writ petition in order to make the Confirmation Order dated 08.09.2025 a part of the writ petition. 4. The learned counsel for the opposite party-respondents have submitted that they have no objection to the prayer so made. 5. Having regard to the statements and averments made in the instant application and the fact that the Confirmation Order has Page No.# 3/3 been passed subsequently on 08.09.2025, the instant application is allowed. 6. The applicant-writ petitioner shall file an amended writ petition accordingly within a period of 1 [one] week from today. 7. The accompanying writ petition be listed immediately after filing of the amended writ petition. Sd/- Sd/- JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant