Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23391 (CHH)

SURESH KUNTI SINGH @ SURESH KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1692/2025 · 2025-06-09

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1692 of 2025 1 - Suresh Kunti Singh @ Suresh Kumar Singh S/o Late Ram Sajivan Singh Aged About 45 Years R/o House No.-59 C, Dhaval Giri Apartment, Sector-11, Noida, P.S. - Nooida, Sector-49, District - Gautam Buddh Naga (U.P.), At Present - A.A.-157, First Floor, Vikas Marg, Shakarpur, Beside Lakshmi Nagar, Delhi ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - S.H.O., Police Station - Cyber Police Thana Range, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent For Petitioner : None. For Respondent/State : Mr. Malay Jain, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 10.06.2025 1. This is an office reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 07.11.2024 passed in MCRC No. 6899 of 2024, while allowing the bail to the applicant, namely, Suresh Kunti Singh @ Suresh Kumar Singh had expressed its trust that the trial Court should make an earnest endeavor to conclude the VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Date: 2025.06.16 12:24:38 +0530 2 trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. 3. The learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 06.05.2025 has requested for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 4. It transpires from perusal of the PUD, that in the present case, the statements of 08 prosecution witnesses have already recorded by the previous Presiding Officer and 03 witnesses are remained to be examined. Considering the numbers of witnesses, the trial is likely to take some more time for its conclusion. Hence, he prays for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 5. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of three months from today. 6. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 7. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice vaishali