Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23386 (GAU)

SHRI JOYDIP DUTTA v. STATE OF NAGALAND AND 2 ORS

I.A.(Crl.)/27/2025 · 2025-10-06

Rajesh Mazumdar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC020005782025 2025:GAU-NL:498 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/27/2025 SHRI JOYDIP DUTTA S/O BAIDYANATH DUTTA, RESIDING AT GOPINATHPUR, ARABINDAPALLI, POLICE STATION- BANKURA, DISTRICT-STATE -WEST BENGAL, PIN- 722101 VERSUS STATE OF NAGALAND AND 2 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF NAGALAND, KOHIMA-797001 2:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE KOHIMA NORTH POLICE STATION KOHIMA NAGALAND-797001 3:THE INVESTIGATION OFFICER CONNECTED TO GR. CASE NO. 149-2023 AND KOHIMA NORTH POLICE STATION CASE NO.51/23 KOHIMA NAGALAND PIN-79700 Advocate for the Petitioner : TONGPANG JAMIR, Advocate for the Respondent : P.P, NAGALAND, Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER Date : 07-10-2025 At the very outset, Mr. Mohammed Shamimuddin, learned counsel appearing for the applicant has prayed before this Court to ignore the word “Revision” appearing at Paragraph (a) of the prayer clause, since he submits that it is a typographical error. The prayer is not objected to by the learned PP for the State. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed. Prayer “A” shall be read as;- “a) Take on record the impugned FIR dated 09.10.2023 as Annexure-R-1 to the present Criminal Petition;” Heard both the learned counsel for the parties. The prayer for taking the FIR dated 09.10.2023 on record in Crl.Pet./23/2025 is allowed. Accordingly, the IA stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant