Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23384 (RAJ)

JEEVANRAM MEENA S/O SHRI MEETHALAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/3932/2025 · 2025-07-25

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:27900] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3932/2025 Jeevanram Meena S/o Shri Meethalal Meena, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Madavari, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Hansraj Meena S/o Shri Harsahaya Meena, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Dhorala, Tehsil Mitrapura, Boli, District Swai Madhopur, Rajasthan At Present R/o B-95, Godavari Apartment, Near Nehru Circle, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Parashar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 25/07/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that matter pertains to a contractual/commercial dispute. It is further submitted that impugned FIR is lodged with a false and concocted narratives to initiate money recovery, by giving criminal colour to the civil dispute. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon Rikhab Birani vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.: 2025 INSC 512. Learned counsel for State has assured to conduct the investigation in the instant matter in light of the circular dated 10.06.2025 and submit the outcome of the said investigation within a period of two weeks, thereafter. [2025:RJ-JP:27900] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3932/2025] It is further directed that no coercive action be taken against the petitioner subject to joining the investigation. Howsoever, it is made clear that the said interim protection is operational till the filing of outcome of the investigation. In light of the above, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/73