[2025:RJ-JP:25679] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10182/2025 1. Samarth Lal Meena S/o Shri Chhuttan Lal Meena, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Village Harnarayana Ka Bas Post Pinan Tehsil Raini Police Station Rajgarh District Alwar (Raj) Head Constable Driver Belt No 1840. 2. Narendra S/o Shri Jalim Singh, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village Khangari Tehsil Nadbai District Bharatpur (Raj) Constable Driver Belt No 1602. 3. Parshuram Meena S/o Shri Damoder Meena, R/o Mantuki Tehsil Pahadi District Deeg Police Station Kaithwara (Raj) Driver Constable Belt No 1034. 4. Babu Lal S/o Shri Latur Ram Meena, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village Post Ronija Road Laxmangarh District Alwar(Raj)Head Constable Driver Belt No 1870. 5. Rati Ram S/o Shri Ram Pratap Meena, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village Aamala Tehsil Raini District Alwar (Raj) Constable Driver Belt No 1044. 6. Jasram Meena S/o Shri Bodan Lal Meena, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village Lodiya Tehsil Raini District Alwar (Raj) Constable Driver Belt No 460. 7. Mukesh Kumar Meena S/o Shri Kailash Chandra Meena, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Post Kandoli Post Chandrapura Tehsil Rajgarh District Alwar (Raj) Constable Driver Belt No 1265. 8. Udesh Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Kailash Chand Sharma, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Post Jadla Tehsil Kathumar District Alwar (Raj) Constable Driver Belt No 41. 9. Ramesh Chand S/o Shri Rudaram, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village Kharshanaki Tehsil Govindgarh District Alwar (Raj) Constable Driver Belt No 1926. 10. Devendra Singh S/o Shri Babu Singh, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Jatoli Thoon Tehsil And District Deeg (Raj) Head Constable (Mto) Belt No 714. 11. Sanjay Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Shyam Lal Sharma, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Post Harsholi Tehsil Kot Kashim District Khairthal Tijara (Raj) Constable Driver [2025:RJ-JP:25679] (2 of 4) [CW-10182/2025] Belt No 1528. 12. Lal Singh S/o Shri Kailash Chand, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Village Ahamadpur Post Akabarpur Tehsil Malakhera District Alwar (Raj)Constable Driver Belt No 1558. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Department Of Home, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Financial Advisor, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. The Superintendent Of Police, Alwar, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Parmanand Paliwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG Ms. Kavita Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 11/07/2025 1. With consent of learned counsel for both the parties, the writ petition has been heard finally on merits. 2. Petitioners, by means of filing instant writ petition, have raised a common grievance for not granting the selection scale for the post of Sub-Inspector on completion of 18 years of service from the post of Constable Driver. It has been pointed out that petitioners belong to M.T. Cadre and since promotional post of ASI from Head Constable is not available, petitioners are eligible and entitled to get selection scale on next promotional post i.e. Sub- Inspector. [2025:RJ-JP:25679] (3 of 4) [CW-10182/2025] 3. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue raised by petitioners in the instant writ petition has been answered positively, by the Coordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur vide Judgment dated 20.12.2023 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3873/2019 titled Amar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., placing reliance on the judgment rendered by Division Bench in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.763/2011 decided on 02.08.2011 titled State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Banney Khan, and affirmed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.1766/2015 on 12.05.2015. The relevant paras of the Judgment of Coordinate Bench dated 20.12.2023 reads as under:- “10.This Court further observes that the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court in the case of State of Rajasthan & Ors. V/s Banney Khan (D.B. Civil Special Appeal (W)No. 763/2011) was challenged before the Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.1766/2015 and the same was affirmed by the Hon'ble Apex Court on 12.05.2015. 11.This Court also observes that the petitioners were appointed on the post in question as M.T. Cadre and thereafter, their next promotional post was Head Constable and then Sub-Inspector as per the M.T. Cadre, and therefore it is clear that the petitioners are eligible for pay scale of the next promotional post, but the said benefit was denied by the respondents, which is not justified in law. 12.This Court further observes that the petitioners at the completion of 9 years of regular services, were granted the pay scale of the next promotional post, but thereafter, on completion of 18 years of the services, the respondents did not grant them the benefits of the next promotional post, which impugned action is not sustainable in the eye of law, because the respondents at the first instance i.e. completion of 9 years of services considered the petitioners for next promotional pay scale as per the M.T. Cadre, but at the same time, denied them the same benefit on completion of 18 years of service. [2025:RJ-JP:25679] (4 of 4) [CW-10182/2025] 13.This Court also observes that the impugned action of denial of grant of the pay scale of the next promotional post to the petitioners by the respondents and granting the petitioners the pay scale of different Cadre i.e. Assistant Sub inspector is not permissible in the eye of the law. 14.Thus, in light of the above observations and afore-quoted precedent laws as well as looking into the factual matrix of the present case, the present petition is allowed and the impugned order dated 10.12.2018 is quashed and set-aside, while directing the respondents to grant to the petitioners the pay scale benefits of the next promotional post as per the M.T. Cadre i.e Sub-Inspector from the date the petitioners became eligible therefor. All pending applications stand disposed of.” 4. Learned Additional Advocate General, Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, appearing for and on behalf of the State, does not dispute that the issue raised by petitioners in the present writ petition is covered by the final judgment dated 20.12.2023 passed in Amar Singh (supra). 5. Learned counsel for both the parties admit that the judgment passed in case of Amar Singh (supra) has been implemented, as the State Government did not opt to assail the judgment passed in case of Amar Singh (supra) dated 20.12.2023. 6. In view of above, the instant writ petition is allowed in terms of judgment dated 20.12.2023 passed in SBCWP No.3873/2019 and petitioners are also entitled to get benefit of selection scale for the post of Sub-Inspector on completion of their 18 years of service on the post of Constable. 7. Stay applications and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J RONAK JAIMAN/4