Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2337 (GAU)

MORZINA BEGUM v. MOKSHED ALI ALIAS MOKSHED NALI PARAMANIK

I.A.(Civil)/2580/2025 · 2026-02-18

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010174962025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2580/2025 MORZINA BEGUM W/O LATE JOYNAL ABDIN SHEIKH, VILL.- AMBARI, P.O.- AMBARI BAZAR, DIST.- GOALPARA, PIN- 783129. VERSUS MOKSHED ALI ALIAS MOKSHED NALI PARAMANIK S/O LATE HOSEN ALI, VILL.- AMBARI KADOTIKA, P.O.- BALAR BHITA, P.O.- BAGUAN, DIST.- GOALPARA, PIN- 783129. 2:THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. G.S. ROAD GANESHGURI P.O.- GANESHGURI GUWAHATI- 781005. 3:THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. BONGAIGAON DIVISION P.O.- BONGAIGAON DIST.- BONGAIGAON PIN- 783382. 4:THE ASSAM BULK CARRIER C/O SARDAR KARNAIL SHING CHITRALEKHA PATH RUKMINIGAON DISPUR H. NO. 14 GUWAHATI- 6 PIN- 781006. Page No.# 2/3 5:JADU MONI SAIKIA S/O GANGA SAIKIA VILL.- MORNOI BEBEJIA P.O.- DHAKUA KHANA DIST.- LAKHIMPUR PIN- 787055. 6:THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. BONGAIGAON DIVISION P.O.- BONGAIGAON DIST.- BONGAIGAON PIN- 783382. INSURED AT REGIONAL OFFICE OF NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. G.S. ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI PIN- 781007 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M A SHEIKH, MR M H CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A ROSHID, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date : 19.02.2026 1. Heard Ms. S. Parbin, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. S. Sarma, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. N. Choudhury, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5. 2. This interlocutory application has been filed by the applicant/appellant in connection with connected MAC Appeal No. 789/2022 praying for an expeditious hearing of the connected appeal. 3. The learned counsel for the respondents does not have any objection Page No.# 3/3 to the prayer made in this interlocutory application. Hence, this interlocutory application is allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant