DINU DUTTA ALIAS DINESH DUTTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./4803/2025 · 2025-08-27
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23368 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23368 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:25448 )
-1- A.B.A. No. 4803 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 4803 of 2025
Dinu Dutta @ Dinesh Dutta, aged about 34 years, son of Gobind Dutta, resident of Village- Lokonia, P.O. & P.S. Narayanpur, District- Jamtara
… Petitioner
-Versus- The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
-----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the State
: Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P.
-----
02/27.08.2025 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bindapathar P.S. Case No.48/2024, registered for the offence under Sections 467/468/471/420/120B of the IPC and under Section 47(a)/52/55 of the Excise Act, pending in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamtara.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has nothing to do with the seized liquor. He submits that the name of the petitioner has come on the confessional statement of apprehended accused person. He further submits that the liquor has been recovered from the house of the apprehended person and that house is not belonging to the petitioner. He submits that one vehicle was parked, which has also been seized and the owner of the vehicle has been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No.7491 of
2024.
3.
Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there against the petitioner of dealing with the illegal liquor.
4. Considering that the name of the petitioner has come on the confessional statement of the apprehended accused person and from the house of the petitioner, the said liquor has not been recovered and the owner
( 2025:JHHC:25448 )
-2- A.B.A. No. 4803 of 2025
of the seized vehicle has been granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid A.B.A. and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamtara in connection with Bindapathar P.S. Case No.48/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,
2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Ajay/