Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2336 (UTT)

AIJAJ v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/156/2025 · 2025-02-17

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory Bail Application No. 156 of 2025 Aijaj and Another ...Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand ….Respondent Present:- Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. Akshay Latwal, Brief Holder for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicants Aijaj and Sajid seek anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.064 of 2025, under Sections 3/5/11(1) of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station Kotwali Manglour, District Haridwar. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants have been falsely implicated based on the statement of the co-accused Gulzar. 4. Learned State Counsel would submit that no separate objection is required to be filed, as such. The anticipatory bail application may be decided based on the material available on record. He would submit that based on the statement of co-accused Gulzar, the applicants have been implicated in the case. 2 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that this is a case, in which the applicants should be granted anticipatory bail. The instant anticipatory bail application deserves to be allowed. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. 7. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicants shall be enlarged on bail on their furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, by each one of them, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“AO”). In addition to it, the applicants shall also comply with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants shall co-operate with the investigation. (ii) The applicants shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever. (iii) The applicants shall not leave the country without prior permission of the court concerned. (iv) The applicants shall deposit their passports with the AO. The passports may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. In case the applicants do not have passport, they shall give an undertaking to that effect to the AO. (v) The applicants shall also give an undertaking on (i), (ii) & (iii) above. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 17.02.2025 Ravi Bisht