Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23348 (KAR)

SMT SAROJAMMMA A v. SMT PRATHIMA K

WP/11841/2025 · 2025-06-16

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20542 WP No. 11841 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 11841 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SAROJAMMMA A, W/O LATE P.D. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 2. SMT. ROHINI. P.N D/O LATE P.D. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS 3. MASTER. MOHITH. P.N S/O LATE P.D. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 4. KUMARI. BHAVANI SHREE P.N D/O LATE P.D. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT NEAR GOVERNMENT SCHOOL, PANATHUR VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 103 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. V. SHIVAKUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. PRATHIMA K, Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20542 WP No. 11841 of 2025 W/O KAVERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT- NO.532, NEAR GOVERNMENT SCHOOL, PANATHUR, VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 103. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MANJUNATH C, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ORDER SETTING ASIDE/QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 01/03/2025 VIDE ANNX-A PASSED BY THE HONBLE XXXVII ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE BANGALORE (CCH-38), REJECTING THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS ON IA NO. 1/2024 IN OS NO. 3439/2022, CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE IA NO. 1/2024 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioners are before this Court seeking the arrest of a suit for injunction on the score that suit for partition between the parties is pending. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20542 WP No. 11841 of 2025 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners after vehemently arguing the matter at length would submit that he would seek liberty to file an application for transfer of the suits to be heard together. 3. The petitioners are reserved liberty to approach the appropriate fora in the event of need in future. 4. With the aforesaid observation, reserving such liberty, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17 CT: BHK