APHC010329232020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21903/2020 Between: 1. GANAPATHI SRINIVASULU, S/O. KRISHNAIAH, AGE. 36, R/O. NOOKINENIPALLE VILLAGE, KUMPINIPURAM POST, NANDALUR MANDAL, KADAPA DIST., ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT. OF HOME, A.P SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NANDLURU, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, NOOKINENIPALLE VILLAGE, NANDLURU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT, 4. THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, NANDULURU, KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. JAGIRDHAR SRIPADHACHARI, S/O. LATE. KRISHNA MURTHY, R/O. D.NO. 202, KAMALAGIRI APARTMENTS, TOLAPPA GARDEN ROAD, TIRUCHANOOR, TIRUPATHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N ASHWANI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2nd Respondent in not considering and not acting upon the representation dated 15.10.2020 submitted by the Petitioner regarding prevailing law and order situation in view of the illegal encroachments made in land admeasuring Ac 1.60 cents in Sy.No.66/13 Nookinenipalle Village Nandlur Mandal Kadapa District pending disposal of O.S.No.79 0f 2 2020 on the file of Honourable Junior Civil Judge Nandalur Kadapa District as being illegal arbitrary in violation of Articles 14 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to consider the representation dated 15.10.2020.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the disputes between the parties are purely civil in nature. 3. For ready reference, the written instructions are extracted hereunder: “It is submitted that the contents of the complaint appeared to be non-cognizable in nature, mainly relating to civil in nature. In view of the same, no case whatsoever was registered except informing the result of the petition to the petitioner. Instead of availing alternative remedies, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.” 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:02.09.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.21903 of 2020 Dt.02.09.2025 Asr