Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13223 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2024 Thana- PARSA District- Saran ======================================================
1. Om Prakash Rai Son of Sheo Nath Rai Resident of Saray Muzaffar, P.S.- Dariyarpur, District- Saran at chapra
2. Sheo Nath Rai son of Late Ramayan Rai Resident of Saray Muzaffar, P.S.- Dariyarpur, District- Saran at chapra
3. Raghu Nath Rai Son of Late Ramayan Rai Resident of Saray Muzaffar, P.S.- Dariyarpur, District- Saran at chapra
4. Kanhaiya Rai @ Kanhaiya Kumar son of Suresh Rai Resident of Saray Muzaffar, P.S.- Dariyarpur, District- Saran at chapra ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 28-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per F.I.R., on 10.02.2024, all the F.I.R. named accused persons including petitioners, armed with lathi, danda and iron rod, attacked the informant while he was returning home on motorcycle. Petitioner no. 1 is alleged to have assaulted on the head of informant with knife, causing grievous
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13223 of 2025(2) dt.28-04-2025 2/3 injury to him. 4. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners have been implicated in this case with general and vague allegation. There is no allegation of assault against petitioner nos. 2, 3 and 4 and have got clean antecedent, whereas petitioner no. 1 is accused in one case, in which, he is on bail. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition. 6. Considering the fact that informant sustained grievous injury, caused by petitioner no. 1 (Om Prakash Rai), his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. 7. However, since there is no allegation of overt act against petitioner nos. 2, 3 and 4 and they have got clean antecedent, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the petitioner nos. 2 to 4, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs.
10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 9th, Saran at Chapra in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 43 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13223 of 2025(2) dt.28-04-2025 3/3
8. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T