B SESHADRI v. The Regional Joint Director of School Education,
WP/15718/2019 · 2025-08-31
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23338 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23338 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010328802019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 15718/2019
Between:
1. B SESHADRI, S/O DANAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, SCHOOL ASSISTANT (SOCIAL), Z.P.H.SCHOOL, RACHAYAPETA, GOPAVARAM MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DIST. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, KADAPA, Y.S.R.KADAPA DIST. 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT AT KADAPA. 3. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AT IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DIST. 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPT., SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or order more in
2 the nature of Mandamus declare the impugned action of the respondents in not considering the petitioner's promotion as Headmaster though his name included at SI.No.4 and approved by the respondents even vacancies are existing is illegal, arbitrary, erroneous and consequently direct the respondents to continue to operate and reckon the seniority of the petitioner as Sl.No.4 uploaded in the Web in the month of September, 2019 and to consider his promotion as Headmaster with all consequential benefits in the ensuing promotion counseling and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to disturb the seniority assigned to the petitioner at SI.No.4 uploaded in the Web in the month of September, 2019 by considering the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Headmaster in the ensuing promotion counseling pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VEPAMANI YASHODA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP)
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 15718 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Smt. Vepamani Yashoda, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, as the petitioner was given promotion, subsequent to filing of the Writ Petition. 2.
Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 01.09.2025 PSA
4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 15718 of 2019
Date: 01.09.2025 PSA