IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 800 of 2025 Date of Decision : 22.8.2025 Sanjeev Kumar and another ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioners : M/s Bodh Raj Thakur and Subhash Chander, Advocates. For respondents No.1 to 3/State : Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Jitender Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents-State. 2. It appears from the perusal of the petition that the offences punishable under Sections 451, 323, 504 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) are compoundable under Section 320 of Cr.P.C. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners, under instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 petition with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty, as prayed for, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 22nd August, 2025 (Chander)