±**<*=ae] APHCO10329282025 EHELE IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADES AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6781 OF 2025 Between : Yaswanth @ K Yeswanth Kumar, S/o K. Ramu, Aged about 24 years, R/o D.No.4-308, BC Colony, Pulakunta Village, Hindupur MandaI, Sri Sathya Sai District, ...PetjtI[Oner/Accused No.2 AND The State of A.P., Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP, Amaravathi. u.Respondent/Complainant Petition under section 438/482 of Cr.P.C/BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Grant AntI-CiPatOry Bail to the Petitioner/Accused No.2 and direct the Station House Officer, Hindupur Rural Police Station, Srj Sathya Sai District to enlarge the bail in the event of arresting the Petitioner/Accused No.2 in Crime No.177 of 2024 on the file of the Hindupur Rural Police Station, Sri Satya Sai District. \ S+3t ' counsel for the petjtl-oner.-sri p v venkata RavII sankar counsel for the Respondent: Ms. P Akhila N:idu AssI'Stant Public Prosecutor The Court made the following order.- \ -\ fij`l.` APHCO10329282025 EiHH IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (sbecial offiginal Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO §B±eB±±±rl NA_I PETITIO=N NO : 67?_1_./L2Q2E Betwee n : yASWANTH ALIAS K YESWANTH KUMAR, S/O K. RAMU, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/O D.NO.4-308, BC COLONY, PULAKuNTA vlLLAGE, HINDUPUR MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT, ."pETITIONER/ACCUSED AND THE STATE OF AP, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP, Amaravathi. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT counsel for the Petitioner/accused: p v VENKATA RAVI SANKAR and Dr. P.B Reddy counsel for the Respondent/complainant: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER-. The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brev-lty {the BNSS') by the petitioner/Accused No.2 for granting of Pre-arrest bail in connection With I--\ r-i 2 Dr, YLR, I crI ~ P bNaot'e6d7::.oof7:20o2255 6iZExp crI'me No.177 of 2024 of Hindupur Rural Police StatI'On, Sri Sathya SaI' District, registered for the alleged offences punishable under sections109 (1),126(2), 351 (1) read with 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhjta, 2023 (for brevity {the BNS'). 2. The case of the prosecution I'S that on 16-08-2024 at about 4:00 p.M., Accused No.1 and cousin of the de-facto complainant's father, created a nuisance in the village in an inebriated state. The de-facto complainant reprimanded A-1 and took hI-m tO thel|r house. SI'nCe then, A-1 had been abusing the de-facto complainant in unparliamentary language in PubII'C and repeatedly threatened him, stating that he would see his end. on 15-08-2024 at about 9.|30 PM, while the de-facto complainant was Proceeding in hI'S auto jn front Of Accused No.1's house, A-1 obstructed him and abused him in filthy language. when the de-facto complainant got down from his auto, A-1 caught hold of his throat and attempted to kill him by strangulating with hl's hands. He also beat him on the`face with hl's hands. At that time, Accused No.2, son of A-1, struck the de-facto complainant on the head with a stone, causing a laceration inJ-ury. On witnessing the incident, sivamma, mother of the d`e-facto complainant, rushed to the spot to rescue her son. However, A-1 and A-2 assaulted her with hands and legs, resulting in sweIIllng injuries on her body. upon hearing the cries, local residents intervened and rescued them. I, 3 Dr. YLR, I crI.P.No.6781 of 2025 Dated 23.07.2025 subsequently, the victims were ac'`,mitted to _the Government Hospital, H'indupur. Hence, the case Was registered. 3. Sri P.V.Venkata Ravi Shankar, the learned COunSel fOrthe Petitioner, submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence|, he was falsely ®lmplicated in this case-, he is sole breadwinner of h'ls family', he is ready ab'lde any conditions to be imposed by this court, and it is urged to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner/Accused No.2. 4. Per confra, Ms.P.Akila Na'ldu, the learned Assistant Public prosecutor, opposed in granting of pre-arrest bail stating that there are specific overt acts attributed aga'lnst the petitioner and investigation is not completed-, 'lf the petitioner is enlarged on pre-arrest bail, he would not be available for the investigation and he will repeat the Same Offence,and it iS urged to dismiss the ba'll appl'lcation. 5. Perused the record. 6. As seen from the FIR lodged by the de-faCtO COmPla'lnant there are spec'lfic ov6rt acts attributed against the Pet'ltiOner that he beat the de-faCtO complainant with a stone on his head and caused bleed'lng injuries and he also beat the mother of the de-facto complainant. 7. In view of the specific overt acts attributed against the Petitioner, this court perceives that there are no merits in the criminal Pet'ltion for grant Of 4 Dr. YLR, J CrI.P.No.6781 of 2025 Dated 23.07.2025 pre-arrest bail to the petl'tI|Oner/Accused No.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the mother of the petitioner/A-2 dI-ed On 21.07.2025 and requested this court to grant liberty to the petitioner/Accused No,2 to surrender before the learned jurisdic`tjona! Magistrate. 8. In the result, the CrI'mI'nal Petition is dismissed. 9| However, as perthe request of the learned counsel forthe petitioner, liberty is given to the pet[-tioner/Accused No.2 to surrender before the learned jurisdI'CtiOna! Magistrate concerned within three (o3) weeks from the date of receI'Pt Of COPY Of this order, and move an appropriate appljcat['on before the learned Magistrate. The learned jurI'SdiCtiOnal Magistrate concerned, is directed {o dispose of the appI]-call-On On its Own merits in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders within a reasonable time, preferably in two (02) days. //TRUE COPY// To] Sd/-K SRINIVASA RAJU AS S I SsTEAcRER: 1. The II Additional District & sessions Judge: Hjndupur, Ananthapur Dl'strI-Ct. 2. The Station House officer, Hjndupur Rural police station, srI' Sathya SaI| District. 3. One CC to Sri P V Venkata RavI' Sankar Advocate [opuc] 4. Two CC's to The Publl'c prosecutor, High court of Andhra pradesh at Amaravati [ouT] 5. Two CD Copies SAM -T7¢ .a_ ..`l-..S- it.!l I.; " HIGH COURT DATED..23/07/2025 ORDER CRLP No. 6781 of 2025 DISMISSING THE CRLP Tt=a?