Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23335 (CHH)

GHANSHYAM PRASAD SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3010/2025 · 2025-06-18

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:25543 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3010 of 2025 Ghanshyam Prasad Sahu S/o Janak Kumar Sahu Aged About 49 Years Posted At Samiti Incharge, Rohra, Registration No. 1072, R/o Rohra, Tahsil Simga District Balodabazar Bhatapara. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Food Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Up - Ayukt Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahkari Vipadan Sangh Maryadit Balodabazar, District Bolodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 3 - Jila Vipdan Adhikari Zila Sahkari Samiti Balodabazar, District Blodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Collector (Food Department) Balodabazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 5 - Nodal Officer/chief Executive Officer Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Balodabazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 6 - Food Officer Balodabazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 7 - District Cooperative Central Bank Branch Simga, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 8 - Deputy Registrar Cooperative Society, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 9 - Cooperative Inspector Development Block Simga, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. 10 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Under Chief Secretary, Food Nagrik Apurty And Upbhokta Sanrakshan Vibhag, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Riyaz Uddin, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Mr. Ashsish Gupta, PL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 19.06.2025 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this petition has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. CC as per rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge J/-