Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:31990] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8657/2025 Tulsidas S/o Dularam, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Ward No. 34, Behind Sindhi Shamshan Ghat, Police Station Khairthal, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gurvindra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 14/08/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.124/2025 registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 8/20 and 8/29 of the NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the recovery of the contraband article was effected from the other co-accused and they have named the petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been in custody for a long and the charge-sheet has already been produced The trial of the
[2025:RJ-JP:31990] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8657/2025] case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the accused-petitioner is a habitual offender and against him 3 criminal cases have been registered under Section 8/29 of the NDPS Act, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. Considering the fact that apart from the version of the co- accused, there is no substantive piece of evidence available on record indicating the petitioner's involvement in the alleged crime, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Tulsidas S/o Dularam, in connection with FIR No.124/2025 registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Alwar, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on the 25th of every month till the conclusion of the trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence
[2025:RJ-JP:31990] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8657/2025] report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach of the above condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/146