Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23330 (JHR)

SANTOSH TIGGA @ SANTOSH KUMAR TIGGA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./5024/2025 · 2025-09-01

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:26586 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No.5024 of 2025 1. Santosh Tigga @ Santosh Kumar Tigga, aged about 40 years, son of Karu Oraon, resident of Village Kaunsi, P.O. & P.S. Barkagaon, Dist. Hazaribag 2. Rati Ganjhu, aged about 39 years, son of Rajeshwar Ganjhu 3. Desai Turi, aged about 65 years, son Chandu Turi of Petitioner no. 2 & 3 are residents of Village Kurra, P.O. & P.S. Giddi, Dist. Hazaribagh …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, A.P.P. ------ 4/01.09.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with G(F) Case No.1193 of 2023, for the alleged offences registered under Section 33(C) of Indian Forest Act, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribagh. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that false allegations are made against the petitioners of excavating the coal in the forest area and the name of the petitioners are disclosed on the secrete information. He submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in Para 12 of the petition. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are made against the petitioners of excavating the coal from forest area. 5. In view of the above and considering that the petitioners have 2025:JHHC:26586 2 got no any criminal antecedent as disclosed in Para 12 of the petition and further considering the nature of allegation, the petitioners are directed to appear before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioners above named on such terms and condition or sureties, the learned Court may deem fit and proper. 6. This Anticipatory Bail Application is accordingly disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) R.Kumar